Wednesday, June 24, 2015

Udo Udeme Udo Final Project PPP

UDO UDEME UDO
FINAL PROJECT
Public Private Partnership IN Nigeria Can be describe as partially successful as most of such project have succeeded while others has failed. Since the  coming democracy, there has been needs in closing infrastructural gap in Nigeria after years of almost no improvement in virtually any sector in the country .
While most of the project have been Federal projects another set of such partnership is with the state government. Although it seems that the state government have little in terms of funds and capacity in the area of assurance on paying back in cases where the finance methodology is on structured payment method. This raises the question on the economy of the project and the risk factor involve.
The second challenge with both state and federal government had to content with was the issue of large debt profile to both foreign and local financiers. As at then Nigeria debt profile stood at about $34 billion external and about $40billion internal debt. That poses a big challenge for the government.
Description: http://media.premiumtimesng.com/wp-content/files/2012/09/Keffi-water-scarcity.jpg
Water challenges in Calabar Cross River state prior to world bank intervention
To tackle these challenges the government took some quick but effective action on debt forgiveness from the Parish club followed by the establishment of Infrastructure Concession Regulatory commission (Icrc), apart from that, the issue of corruption in the area of procurement processes the government established the Bureau of Public Procurement (BPP) to assure bidders and project financier that the procurement of contract would be transparent.
Today several project such as the
·         Rehabilitation and Upgrade of Murtala Muhammed  Airport Road
·         Construction of 2nd Niger Bridge Proposed
·         Construction of River Niger Bridge at Nupeko Proposed
And many other project by external sponsors such as the Calabar water project sponsored by world bank, and the Abuja speed rail project funded by the Chinese bank under Build Operate and Transfer arrangement at the cost of 500 Million dollar.
On this project I will focus on the Development of Katampe District under PPP arrangement

FEDERAL CAPITAL TERRITORY ADMINISTRATION
(FCTA),
 PROJECT NAME:                                Development of Katampe District
DESCRIPTION:                                   Accelerated development of urban
districts across the Federal Capital Territory (FCT),
with Katampe district as a Pilot Case.

 PROJECT COST ESTIMATE:               N61 billion
 PPP MODEL:                                      Build Operate and Transfer (BOT)
 REVENUE REVENUE MODEL: User Charges

Description: http://soft2ools.com/jit_unesco/images/clip_image002.gif Federal Capital Ministry
 PROJECT STATUS:             The Concession Contract was signed                                                                               on 19th Oct, 2010. Ground breaking ceremony wa held on the 2nd of    February 2012

This project stands a very good chance for success as one the infrastructural challenges of the Nation’s capital city is housing. The housing deficit in Nigeria is put at about 17 million (daily independent newspaper , 14th April, 2015.
And Abuja being the fastest growing city in the country with a large number of middle class need a substantive housing project. To tackle this, there need for opening of new layout to discourage building more slums.

The economics of the project is high as most project of this kind have a consistent record of success due to the numbers of available off-takers for housing.  With fair payback option, and a very good location such as Katamkpe an annex of the luxury Maitama area a very expensive part of Abuja. And a 30 years concession plans it indeed a give away project, as usual with any of such project in the FCT, the project is fully guaranteed with and Irrevocable Standing Payment Order/Bank Guarantee. This make the risk well in favour of the private sector. On the government angle, there is no financial commitment except the allocation of land and administrative cost for effective supervision of the project. This project will provide a good housing for over 40,000 peoples.

References: